Friday, 21 March 2014

Where the Mind is Without Fear

Where the mind is without fear..


            Is Kerala the most insecure State in the Country for women? Yes, said a recent survey conducted by a private research organization and telecast through a prominent channel. 73% of women in Kerala opined to them that they do not feel safe in Kerala! Is it just a feeling or are they really unsafe? Who and what do they fear?
            Is it the truth? What were the criteria for the survey? Were women across the State from various social and economic backgrounds and from different age groups questioned? Is Kerala even worse than Delhi, Haryana, UP and West Bengal? In the channel discussion, a senior journalist admitted that he was not surprised that this is so since young women journalists often request him to post them anywhere but Kerala!
Most of the local newspapers seem to have accepted this as a well known fact and have not heeded much attention to this survey, save one, which interviewed a few women and reiterated that women should not dare to walk in dark (darkness of ignorance or after dusk?) in Kerala. Unfortunately no police officer was asked for comments by this particular newspaper and the report was published rather unimportantly in the city pages.     
            As the Nodal Officer of Nirbhaya Keralam Project, the main aim of which is to remove all sorts of fear from women and children, I asked a few ladies what makes them feel insecure. A majority said that it was the attitude of men and the social breeding they are subjected to from childhood onwards at home, educational institution and at work place that make them feel scared of men. Some women said that roads and lanes with no street lights are very scary after sunset. A few responded that lack of visibility of uniformed police men and women in public places make them feel unsafe. Univocally, all agreed that the insecurity they felt was due to unwelcome sexual advances by men.
Is it right to say that if 73% of women feel insecure then at least 50% of men are responsible for it? What could be the reason for this sex-starved behaviour by men? Gender discrimination starts at home, where boys are considered superior to girls by their parents and are given preferential treatment and more freedom. Girls are taught to be meek, shy and humble from a very young age by the elders at home and even by the teachers in school. Kerala may be the only State where girls and boys are segregated into different compartments from childhood to old age. Go to a school or a college, you will see the boys seated on one side and girls on the other- in the classrooms and also in the auditorium where functions are held. Go to a public function, any public function, and you will see men clustering on the right side and women on the left. If any woman dares to sit on the side of men due to lack of seats on the left side of the hall, she will be viewed with disdain.  This unhealthy relationship between boys and girls breeds lack of respect of women in men. Since the victims fear the after-effects of responding to sexual harassment, most of the offences remain unreported and the perpetrators get encouraged to continue their bad behaviour.
Fear of the known have solutions, it is often fear of the unknown that pose complications and make women feel insecure. Several women approach me on a daily basis with their fears. Their problems are minor and easily solvable. Domestic violence, marital discord, eve teasing in public places, cheating by lovers and sometimes harassment at work places, all such problems have permanent legal solutions. But they do not need solutions through police intervention; they need a lot of advice. They will never give a written complaint or go to the concerned Police Stations to file complaints how much ever I coax them. They demand that I resort to the illegal method of calling the counter petitioner and settling the issue through warnings and threats.
‘What if?’ is a favourite phrase of women in distress. What if relatives come to know? What if I the counter petitioners get vindictive? What if family gets disrupted? What if legal system prolongs? What if there will be unwanted publicity? Convincing women to file complaints at the Police Stations is my biggest challenge.
Ignorance is not bliss, it is a big bane. Women will have to know the legal protection that is available to them and use it for their protection. I cannot blame them much since even the Police Officers are ignorant about the new additions and nuances of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 which has been enacted for protecting women from harassment as aftermath of 16th December 2012 Nirbhaya incident in New Delhi. This new Act has made several new offences such as request for sexual favours, remarks having sexual colour and stalking, all of which are punishable up to 5 years. Peeping toms (voyeurism) will get up to seven years and men who pry into emails and digital media accounts of women will get up to five years imprisonment. Several new sections are added to section 376 (rape) and offence is made punishable for life or up to twenty years. Acid attacks are punishable up to 10 years and maximum penalty for trafficking of children is 14 years. Further, public servants disobeying law and not providing medical treatment to victims are punishable up to two years. This Act has also outlined the relief which the State has to give as a welfare measure to the victims of sexual crimes. Although this is a milestone Amendment to Indian Penal Code, many men consider it as too harsh and have reacted strongly against it, saying that women will misuse it.
Misuse? Hardly! Women do not even know how to use what is available for them. I have seen many women spend huge amounts to purchase household articles and electrical/electronic gadgets and keep them safe, wrapped away in cupboards for use at a better time. After several months, when they ultimately decide to use them, it will be unusable- rusted, outdated or moth eaten! Laws have the same nature. Dowry Prohibition Act is one such Act which is lying crumbled in a corner due to lack of use. Several provisions of Kerala Police Act 2011, especially section 119 dealing with punishment for atrocities against women are slowly getting rusted. Knowledge of law is a great thing to possess; it will boost up confidence in women. What use is that knowledge if it will not be used even in dire situations?
Implementation of the Nirbhaya Keralam Project will not be an easy task unless women are willing to shun the garbs of low self esteem and unfounded doubts. Creating awareness and educating women about legal protection available to them and basic rules of self defence also may not work in times of need. It was heartening to see a girl who is a karate star bravely fight and resist men who attempted to tease her last year in the capital city. Yet recently, another girl who had learnt karate in school could not protect herself from an attack by a molester inside a public transportation because she ‘froze’.  Reactions differ from people to people. Women generally tend not to react. They feel it is safe to keep mum when someone misbehaves with them or when they see another getting sexually harassed. Despite telling them to resist, respond and react, they consider it safe to withdraw inside their shells and shed silent tears!
A better option, I think will be to educate the men to be gentlemanly. An officer in the rank of Director General of Police has wisely suggested starting ‘Gentleman Boy’s Clubs’ in Schools and Colleges to educate boys to respect women and to be cordial to them. Government of Kerala has accepted this proposal as part of the Nirbhaya Scheme, soon to be implemented.
I implore the women of Kerala to awaken from their self imposed stupor and tread boldly into the realm esteem, free from abuse. ‘Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high’, let us be! (Courtesy Rabindra Nath Tagore)
           


Thursday, 6 February 2014

Is love for animals a sin?

Recently, a journalist called me over the phone and introduced himself as Anil from a news channel. The conversation was as below.
"Madam, don't you walk everyday on the Kowdiar Road?"
"Yes, I do"
"Have you ever been bitten by a pack of street dogs? Have you seen them attack anyone? Because yesterday a pack of unruly stray dogs attacked a pedestrian without any provocation and he was badly injured"
"That's surprising. Because I hardly see any dogs on the road these days. There used to be many dogs before. How do you know this?"
"We got a video."
"Can you please send it to me? I'll respond after seeing it."
"Actually, I do not have the video of dogs attacking the man, but of the man after the attack, bleeding profusely. His arteries got cut."
"Strange! I have seen men attack dogs..like stoning and hitting them with vehicles. I have never seen a dog bite a man without provocation, unless it is rabid."
"Please watch the 10 AM news."
I did. The news said a pack of dogs attacked this man and after they were chased away, they came back to attack him over and over again. Words such as 'he was dragged away', 'fallen man was attacked', 'came back again to attack', 'man was bleeding for hours' etc were used. The channel reporter further went on to speak about other people attacked by these viocious alien creatures called stray dogs and showed some visuals of crying children and skinny dogs on the streets.
Next day, the newspaper carried this news. Heading was- "No dogs will bite without provocation- says senior woman police officer." A distorted version of the conversation was given in which my name was left out. The report concluded-"People are aghast at the animal love of this officer in preference to human love!"
I wrote a letter to the editor mentioning that I was called by a journalist and my comments were asked. Then my comments were twisted out of proportions and published. I also protested in not publishing my name and distorting my views.
Result?
Another distorted and grossly edited version of my letter appeared in the next day's newspaper. It reiterated that the views of Sreelekha IPS was that dogs do not bite without provocation and invited people to respond to it. Naturally, the press selected the responses that were against my views and published those which said that street dogs do bite innocent by passers indiscriminately.
I traced out the man in the news channel. He confessed to me that he tripped on a sleeping dog and fell, his right leg went inside the dog's mouth and he kicked it away with his left leg. There were 3 small marks near the toes and one underneath. His shoe was undamaged but on the socks a little blood was there. Being a heart patient on medicines which thin the blood, he bled profusely from this injury. This proved that the report was highly exaggerated. Next day, the same newspaper published his photo and another distorted version- that he was hurt more by the remarks of ADGP than from the dog bite!!!
This media achieved its purpose! The Corporation of Trivandrum started catching dogs and killed over 55 of them in two days in violation of Supreme Court directions not to kill street dogs. The public started to poison, beat to death and hit with vehicles the dogs they accosted on the streets. People started walking on the streets with huge stones and sticks. Even in the assembly, the elected representatives united in their hatred of dogs.
In a program called "parayathe vayya", a sarcastic comment was made that the animal loving ADGP studied all the laws existing in India to protect stray dogs, failing which she wrote in defense of them!
A talk show by another channel on 'menace of stray dogs' silenced those who came in defense of sterilizing dogs and supported those who wanted to kill them.
KILL, KILL, KILL!!! Everyone is crying.
Humans are the most superior creation of God. All other beings are created for man's pleasure. No wonder Elephants are caught from forests, trained cruelly, tortured, paraded in grotesque attire on festivals,  made to work hard by timber merchants and killed after it serves its purpose for claiming the insurance amount. No wonder most of the butcheries in the State are illegal. Pet shops do not have licences, they breed animals indiscriminately for profit, inbreed them and throw unwanted pups on the streets.
I do agree that humans are more important than animals. Rabid dogs should be put to sleep. Street dogs should be controlled. We should sterilize them so that their population will not increase. We should restrict indiscriminate breeding of dogs.
But is animal love such a big sin? Is it a worser sin than some media's insane love of 'rubber'?
N. K. Achary so rightly said once- "a journalist will address his neighbor's cock too 'sir', for it to leave the owner's cage and enter his!"